How to Report a Correction
Submit a correction through our contact page with:
- The article URL where the error appears.
- The specific statement you believe is wrong (a quote or screenshot is helpful).
- The correct information along with a source we can verify (a spec sheet, an official product page, a test result, etc.).
You don't need to be an expert — if something looks off, tell us. We'd rather investigate ten good-faith reports and find nine were fine than miss one real error.
Our response commitment: We aim to acknowledge your report within 48 hours and act on verified corrections within 7 business days. If verification takes longer (e.g., we need to re-test a TV), we'll let you know and provide an estimated timeline.
How We Categorize and Handle Corrections
Substantive Corrections
A factual error that could mislead a reader — a wrong specification, an incorrect test result, a misattributed feature, or a flawed comparison.
What we do:
- Add an inline “Correction (date):” note directly above the original wording.
- Strike through the original wording rather than deleting it, so readers can see exactly what changed.
- Add a public entry to the Corrections Log at the bottom of this page.
- If the correction materially changes a product recommendation or score, we add an update banner to the top of the article and, where possible, notify readers who engaged with the original through on-site alerts.
Minor Edits
A typo, a broken link, a renamed product page, an updated retailer URL, or a formatting issue that doesn't affect the substance of the article.
What we do:
- Fix silently. No log entry, no inline note.
Major Retractions
The article's core argument, recommendation, or methodology was fundamentally flawed to the point where inline corrections can't salvage it.
What we do:
- Add a retraction banner to the top of the original article explaining what went wrong.
- Preserve the original article at its URL (we don't delete published work) with the banner serving as a permanent notice.
- Publish a new article written from scratch, linked from the retraction banner, if the topic still warrants coverage.
- Add a log entry to the Corrections Log with a clear “Retraction” label.
Our Commitment to Reporters
We take every correction report seriously regardless of who sends it — a first-time reader, an industry professional, or a competing publication. We never retaliate against or publicly identify someone who reports a correction unless they give us explicit permission to credit them. If you'd like to be credited in the log (the “Flagged by” column), let us know in your email and we'll happily include your name or handle.
Public Corrections Log
The table below is a reverse-chronological record of every substantive correction and retraction we've made. We never remove entries from this log.
| Date | Article | What We Got Wrong | What's Correct Now | Type | Flagged By |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No corrections logged yet. | |||||
This log will be populated as corrections are made. An empty log on a new site means we just launched — not that we're hiding anything. Check back, and hold us to it.
This policy was last reviewed on 20th May, 2026. Questions about our corrections process can be submitted through our contact page.